For Sale: 3BR/1BA Single Family House in Buena Park, CA, $330,000

For Sale: 3BR/1BA Single Family House in Buena Park, CA, $330,000

Montclair Home

Lupe Medina | RE/MAX Metro Realty | homesbyareamail@yahoo.com | 866-466-6650 9841 Mills Ave, Montclair, CA Remodel, quite neighborhood, new windows, tile flooring, granite cabinets, new bathrooms,fireplace, fire pit, fruite trees 3BR/2BA Single Family House offered at $250,000 Year Built 1955 Sq Footage 1,626 Bedrooms 3 Bathrooms 2 full, 0 partial Floors 1 Parking Unspecified Lot Size 7,405 sqft HOA/Maint $0 per month DESCRIPTION Short Sale in prosses. Make your best offer see additional photos below PROPERTY FEATURES - Central A/C - Central heat - Fireplace - Tile floor - Family room - Living room - Granite countertop - Laundry area - inside - Jacuzzi/Whirlpool ADDITIONAL PHOTOS Front view Contact info: Lupe Medina RE/MAX Metro Realty homesbyareamail@yahoo.com 866-466-6650 For sale by agent/broker Equal Opportunity Housing Posted: Dec 27, 2009, 8:21am PST

Webs Popover

Webs Popover: "Visit My Website"

What happens when a lender can’t produce the original note?

What happens when a lender can’t produce the original note?
A growing number of homeowners around the country are using a foreclosure defense that may help them retain their homes. It’s called “Produce the Note” (as also being jointly advocated by The Consumer Warning Network) and we want you to know this is not a mere technicality that should be treated lightly by the lender or by the Court.

Everyone needs to understand the importance of this issue. When a lender can’t produce the original note, allowing a foreclosure to proceed puts the homeowner at risk of owing that debt again to another party in the future. Therefore, great caution must be taken before a judge can allow someone who can’t produce the original note to cash in on your home.

What if Your Lender CAN’T Produce the Note?

So, what happens when the lender tells the Court it can’t produce the original note, because it is lost? Let’s start with the basics. If a lender wants to foreclose on a property, it has to be able to show that it is, in fact, the appropriate person to whom the money is owed. That right to foreclose belongs ONLY to the person who has legitimate POSSESSION OF THE ORIGINAL NOTE - not a copy, not an electronic entry, but the original note itself with the original signature of the person(s) who allegedly owes the money along with appropriate raised notary seal and signature. So, if you are faced with a foreclosure, you have every right to demand that the person or entity trying to take your property, first prove to the Court that they have the legal right do to so in the first place by proving they have legal possession of the original promissory note.

In my opinion, an original mortgage note is much like legal tender and should be guarded and protected as such by the person holding such an asset. Loosing an original mortgage note is like loosing a $100 bill or a gift card or a lottery ticket. What if I scratched that million dollar ticket and just stuck it somewhere and misplaced it? Do you think I could just show up at lottery headquarters and claim my prize without having the winning ticket? The same principle applies to the person or entity claiming to be the legal holder of an original mortgage note. He who holds the note holds the key.

What the Lender Must Do

What often happens, however, is that the lender claims it doesn’t have the original note, because that note has been lost or destroyed. If the lender is making such a claim, the law requires the lender to prove all of the following under the “Uniform Commercial Code”, which is a set of laws governing commercial transactions that many states have adopted. It contains a specific provision on this subject (Section 3-309) which states that a person can enforce a promissory note without having the original, BUT only under certain limited circumstances.

1. The person or entity has to swear and attest that it no longer has the original note;
2. The person or entity has to prove that it was properly in possession of the note and was entitled to enforce it WHEN it lost possession of the note;
3. The person or entity has to prove it didn’t “lose” possession simply because it transferred the note to someone else (i.e., it’s not really lost); and
4. The person or entity has to prove that it cannot produce the original note because the instrument was destroyed or its whereabouts cannot be determined or it was stolen by someone who had no right to it.

All of these matters have to be definitively proven by the person or entity trying to foreclose on the property. It is not the obligation of the borrower to prove or disprove any of this. The borrower can challenge the right of the person or entity trying to foreclose and demand proof.

The Court’s Important Role

It is up to the Court to determine whether the lender has satisfactorily proven why it no longer can produce the original note. The Court also has to be satisfied that when the original note was lost, the person trying to foreclose on the property had possession of the note at the time it was lost. Until the Court has been satisfied of all of this, the foreclosure cannot proceed.

It is also important for the Court itself to understand that this issue is not merely a “technicality” and the judge should not be satisfied with anything less than full proof of this issue. The Court itself needs to appreciate the fact that if it should agree that an original note has been legitimately lost (and allows the foreclosure to proceed) it is the borrower who is still at risk.

Why? Because incredibly, even if a Court has found that the original note is lost and the foreclosure sale is finalized, if someone later turns up with the original note and proves that it is the proper holder of the note, and not the person who foreclosed on the property, the original borrower is STILL LIABLE.
That’s right. Someone took your home and the Court allowed it because it believed that the lender proved that the note was lost and it was the proper party. Then someone legitimate shows up in the future with the actual note and you still owe that person the money even though your property was taken with the blessing of the Court. Trust me, this is a very serious issue regarding post foreclosures and post pre-foreclosure short-sales. It has happened to three of our own clients! These homeowners had the need to sell their property by means of a negotiated short-sale (so they could avoid a foreclosure) only to find out that the entity claiming to have the legal right and authority to enter into such negotiations and accept such settlements sold their note to another entity and weren’t even aware of it. Several months later, the newly assigned lenders (now claiming to be the rightful owners of our client’s original notes) have since come forward and have also filed suite seeking to recover their entire outstanding principle balances owed to them (prior to the homeowners closing their short-sale transactions with the wrong note holders).
How fair is that?!?! It’s not! And that’s why homeowners need to start fighting back when someone is trying to take their home by foreclosure, especially since an overwhelming percentage of mortgages granted over the last 3 to 5 years have been packaged into securities and re-sold and re-assigned numerous times since the inception of the borrower's original note and mortgage. In some states, homeowners have better than a 50/50 chance of being successful in defending themselves against a completed foreclosure. Why wouldn’t anyone who owns a home do everything in their power to protect and defend it?

All the Best,

Rick D. Misitano, Senior Paralegal
Law Offices of James M. Bosco & Associates
Methuen Executive Park
240 Pleasant Street
Methuen, Massachusetts 01844
Phone: (978) 687-8804
Fax: (978) 687-8872
boscolaw@comcast.net

MODIFICATION, SHORT SALE OR FORECLOSURE

I am pulling my hair over this subject.

What can I recommend to my clients, people that call me or contact me via email in regards to this concerns.

I must touch my heart and spill out my...... on this.

Let's face it nobody wants to tell their clients what is best, if their interest on a Loan Modification is the one reason home owner care the most.

They don't like to hear FORECLOSURE, SHORT SALE or BK as and option.

Banks are not correcting the problem by lowering the loan amount. they are only buying time for what it is foreseeable.

Home owner will not remain on a Modification program when they see their home value creeping down.

Who will, I won't, would you?

Let's face it. Why would I continue to make payments on a property that has lost almost half of it's value.

How about this... Your neighborhood is not what it was before. All neighborhoods?..

No, I am not picking on all neighborhoods, but in many cases the area will not be what it used to be.

We all find a shell in our life, and that shell has a big crack (Property value).

Do wherever is best for you, but a loan modification may not be the best. It may be for now , but how about later?

Oscar Matamoros/Marketing


_